Skip to main content

Pope Francis/Bill Clinton Crimes vs. Bill O' Reilly/Bishop Finn Crimes

      
If Pope Francis and Bill Clinton were Bill O'Reilly and Bishop Robert Finn would they have been fired or forced to resign?

Put in other ways:

Do the crimes of O'Reilly/Finn pale in comparison to the crimes of Clinton/Francis?

Do the the alleged sexually inappropriate acts of the conservative Bill O'Reilly appear lightweight compared to the gravity of the liberal Clinton's alleged sexual crimes?

Does the so-called cover-up of conservative Bishop Finn appear lightweight compared to the gravity of the liberal Pope Francis's act of placing youths at risk to a known sexual predator?

Sex abuse experts psychologist Gerard van den Aardweg and Rick Fitzgerald M.D. reported:

"Pope Francis' restoring to priestly ministry an Italian priest Fr. Mauro Inzoli, who was laicized by Pope Benedict XVI for homosexually abusing adolescent males. After his priestly facilities were restored, he again repeated his homosexual abuse of youth, was arrested and imprisoned."

In the United States, a member of the hierarchy who deliberately places youth at risk of abuse by a known sexual predator is expected to resign." (Lifesitenews, March 6,2017)

The website Veneremurcernui reviewed the Finn case:

"Bishop Finn followed legal protocol and advice in his treatment of defrocked Fr. Shawn Ratigan, and removed him from service after he was found to have taken upskirt photos of underage girls. But Fr. Ratigan repeated his (comparatively minor) crime and the KC media...mounted a relentless campaign of destruction." (veneremurcerni.word.com, April 27, 2017)

Freedom Outpost reported:

Juanita "Broaddrick claims that Bill Clinton raped her twice in a hotel room in 1978 and that Hillary Clinton was involved in covering it up." (FreedomOutPost.com, April 25, 2017)

The left wing Daily Beast reviewed the boorish sexual-harassment claims against O'Reilly:

-"O'Reilly tried to kiss her."

- Accused "O'Reilly of proportioning her."

--"O'Reilly called her "hot chocolate" (she was black) and would grunted and leer at her"

- "O'Reilly had made unwanted advances at her."

-"O'Reilly would masturbate while on the phone with Mackris." (TheDailyBeast.com, April 19,2017)

The allegations against O'Reilly if true are boorish and very wrong, but they are not the serious crimes of two times raping a woman which entails prison time.

To be fair to Clinton and O'Reilly in the United States you are not guilty until proven so in a court of law.

The case against Bishop Finn is plainly unjust. There is no reason he should have been forced to resign.

Pope Francis if he was a United States bishop would have been "expected to resign."






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is the Media now Brainwashing on the Hour using the Hitler "Big Lie" Propaganda Technique?

The mainstream media has become what the supermarket checkout line tabloids used to be, but the tabloids were more entertaining and truthful. They were not like the present USA Communist or Nazi totalitarian-like media that censored first the New York Post Hunter Biden scandal and are now on a daily basis almost censoring all voter fraud evidence filed in lawsuits with brainwashing sound bits on the hour with magical mantras such as:  "unfounded voter fraud." Or, yesterday, as only one of the continuous brainwashing sound bits, since the Supreme Court upheld religious freedom and the United States Constitution, we had the brainwashing session on the hour where the media said: The Supreme Court is evil for not supporting really, really smart Democrat and non-hypocritical governors, but the media used journalistic jargon to make it sound really, really possibly "objective" despite telling a "big lie." The New York Times, CBS, AP and the rest are apparently c...

Pope Francis's Porn-Related Scandals

Note: Thanks for prayers. The Catholic Monitor is accessible again. Thanks be to God. It started with the minor scandal of Pope Francis blessing "a green parrot belonging to a rather well-known porn actor in Italy named Francesco Lombardi" on January 29, 2014 according to Relevant magazine.com. The next scandal was the supposed "action" and Vatican "arrest" of Francis's Vatican against accused paedophile Archbishop Josef Wesolowski. Betty Clermont of the Dailykos.com on August 13, 2015 wrote: "Had the trial taken place, testimony would have confirmed that the pope allowed Wesolowski to remain a free man for 14 months regardless of how many times the Pope said he was taking "action" against prelates on the issue of sex abuse; and that during this time, Wesolowski acquired more than 100,000 computer files of pornography with disturbing photos of children who were likely victims of human trafficking." Journalist Clermont on...

Does Pope Francis Believe in Truth or Power?

      Catholic common sense, following St. Thomas Aquinas's philosophy, believes that our senses and reason are reliable. Truth can be known. In Edward Feser's philosophy blog a commenter named Rank Sophist argued against truth saying that Eastern philosophy believes that the senses and logic "lie." Reality, truth and reason in Eastern Philosophy are "Maya" which means they are ultimately total illusion. The sophist made me laugh. Why is the dummy bothering to write (sense of sight) and agrue (logical presentation) if the guy believes the senses and reason are illusion? The theologians that Pope Francis believes to be reliable such as the Hegelian Cardinal Kasper and the Postmodernist Michel de Certeau (Bergoglio's favorite theologian), like the sophist, don't believe in objective truth or reason. But unlike the Rank Sophist, they can't be laughed away. They believe in power. Eminent Austrian philosopher Thomas Stark, in an ...